An Independent Comparison of
Bluehost and HostMonster and WebHostingHub:
The comparison article of HostMonster Vs Bluehost Vs WebHostingHub is based on their verified customer’s feedbacks and rates, also includes our editors’ independent view-point and real hosting experience. Most of bloggers, web designers and web developers should have heard of these 3 famous web hosts, which one is the best hosting company among them? Indeed, all of these three web hosts have won a good reputation from their existing clients and this article is according to the comparison of their hosting prices, site speed, server performance, feature values, customer support and data center devices. We do have a very strict criteria to determine a good web host on our review site and you may check a detailed comparison as below.
Overall Rating – WebHostingHub and Bluehost are the Winners:
According to our site readers’ feebacks about their general impression of HostMonster Vs Bluehost Vs WebHostingHub, we’ll list an overall rating scores about the 3 famous web hosts as below. You may have found both WebHostingHub and Bluehost have received a 5 star rating, HostMonster seems to be a bit weaker, it just received 4 star rating in a general impression score.
Editors’ review about WebHostingHub:
WebHostingHub has been providing quality web hosting service to online users over 12 years. The company launched business since 2001 in Virginia, over 10 years’ fast growing and high developing, the company has become a leading web hosting service provider for bloggers and small businesses. The company offers all in one single hosting package which you can get everything as you want to build a new website.
Editors’ review about Bluehost:
Bluehost is one of the oldest web hosting company who launched business since 1996 and over 17 years’ high growth and developing, the company is already serving over 1.2 million websites world-wide. Their customers come from every corner of the planet, covering 4 continents and 5 oceans with over 120 countries and regions. At the very beginning, Bluehost offered one single hosting package to their customers only and now the company also can provide reseller hosting and dedicated server solutions to higher-level customers.
Editors’ review about HostMonster:
The history of HostMonster is as long as Bluehost, you may have found most of their web hosting features, prices and even their homepages are basically the same. No wonder there’re so many analysts say they’re belonged to the same owner. Whatever, whether they’re the same web host or not, at here we only compare the advantages of each web host and our object is to select out a best one which can be used to recommend to our readers.
Price Comparison – Bluehost and HostMonster are the Winners:
No matter what the product is, the price is always one of the most important factors we’ve to consider before purchasing. Which web host is more cost-effective? According to our investigation, Bluehost is the cheapest one and you may check the table as below to compare.
|Years of Term||Bluehost||WebHostingHub||HostMonster|
|2 Year||$5.95 /mo||$5.99/mo||$5.95/mo|
|1 Year||$6.95 /mo||$6.99/mo||$6.95/mo|
|Money Back||Anytime||90 Days||30 Days|
We can easily find WebHostingHub is a bit more expensive than the other 2 web hosts. All of these 3 web hosts are offering 1 hosting plan in their shared hosting services only, so we didn’t waste much time to list the table of price comparison.
Bluehost shared hosting plan starts with as low as $4.95 per month if you subscribe their web hosting service for 36 months, which is only $0.04/mo cheaper than WebHostingHub.
Though their web hosting prices don’t have much differences, we still need to select out a winner on the price value. Obviously, Bluehost and HostMonster are the winners in the price comparison.
Web Hosting Features – Bluehost Vs WebHostingHub are the Winners:
Both Bluehost and WebHostingHub offer competitive web hosting services with powerful hosting features, from a free domain name to many unlimited features such as unlimited disk space, unlimited bandwidth, unlimited websites, unlimited MySQL databases and unlimited email accounts, etc. All of the 3 web hosts are using cPanel as their hosting control panel, so most of their operating functions in the backend are similar the same.
HostMonster, however, it seems to be a bit disappointment compared to the other 2 web hosts. It allows you to create 100 MySQL databases at most and their money back policy is only suited for 30 days only.
|CGI / Perl|
|Ruby on Rails (ROR)|
|24×7 Live Chat|
|24×7 Email Support|
|24×7 Phone Support|
|Visit||Click Here >>||Click Here >>||Click Here >>|
We can easily find WebHostingHub offers much more free Marketing Credits to customers, you can receive $200 free credits for Google AdWords, FaceBook, Bing and Yahoo.
Another noticeable feature you can receive from the 3 famous web hosts is script auto-installer that allows you to install multiple popular applications with 1-click auto installation in their cPanel control panel.
What’re the free applications include in the script auto-installer? Almost all of the popular blog, CMS and eCommerce shopping cart applications are included, such as WordPress, Joomla, osCommerce, Zen-Cart, Magento Commerce, Drupal, PrestaShop and over 57+ free scripts in total.
Performance and Site Speed – Bluehost Wins:
We believe the performance of a web server is always one of the top and most important factors for web masters and software developers to consider before choosing a web host. Which web host is the winner in the aspect of web hosting performance? In order to receive a more accurate result, our editors determined to open 3 hosting accounts with each provider to make a test ourselves.
Our editors had tried to install WordPress and osCommerce shopping cart application on the 3 web hosts and finally we found Bluehost was the winner in site speed and server reliability.
You can check image as above to see the server response and site speed with each web host.
- Bluehost’s average server response time is 230ms which is 15% faster than WebHostingHub (265ms) and 140% faster than HostMonster (540ms).
- WebHostingHub’s average server response time is 110% faster than HostMonster
One month after we installed WordPress and osCommerce on these three web hosts, we also received a such conclusion: Bluehost web server is more reliable than WebHostingHub, and WebHostingHub web server performance is better than HostMonster.
Why Bluehost can receive better server reliability and faster speed?
We’ve tried to contact with their support team and also done lots of works to find out why their performance of web servers can beat down so many competitors. Finally we found the company already has invested millions of US dollars to improve all of their server with Dell brand and they’re also the first company successfully customized Linux kernel which can guarantee server resources to each user on their web servers won’t be interrupted by other clients in 2010. And they’re also the first provider released BettlerLinux on their shared hosting servers in 2012.
*BetterLinux is a component can be installed on a Linux web server to optimize and improve performance substantially.
Customer Support Comparison:
The customer support service is another important aspect we’ve to check before choosing a best web host for our readers. All of these 3 web hosts offer 24/7 customer support through live chat, phone and email, which web host is more professional and efficient?
- Both Bluehost and WebHostingHub request their average response time in email technical support should be within 15 minutes after clients submit a ticket
- HostMonster requests their ticket average response time should be less than half an hour.
- All of these 3 web hosts request their online operators should pick up new phone call-in less than 20 seconds.
We did have tried to make a phone call to Bluehost calling center and one of their operator named Jessie did pick up our phone call quickly, she was real politely and friendly, real impressed with her patient service.
According to this detailed comparison above, both Bluehost and WebHostingHub are ideal choices for budget cost customers who also need a reliable web hosting service.
Overall, Bluehost is the winner compared to the other 2 web hosts and they’re the winner in hosting prices, feature values, customer support and excellent hosting performance.
If you’ve any further concerns or encounter any difficulties in choosing a right web host, please feel free to leave a comment and our editors will reply back as soon as possible.